AQMesh co-location comparison trial results for PM10 in London, UK (V3.0h)
|Correlation co-efficient (R2)||0.96|
|Date||December 2017 - January 2017|
|AQMesh processing algorithm||V3.0h|
|Averaged sample interval||1 hour|
All comparison trials are from regularly maintained reference stations. Not all are specifically identified due to the administrative overhead of getting permission to name data sources. We do not always use ratified reference data to avoid delays in analysis but re-running the comparison analysis after data ratification often improves correlation.
AQMesh co-location comparison trial results for PM10 in Minnesota, USA (V3.0)
AQMesh co-location comparison trial results for PM10 in Scotland, UK (V2.0)
AQMesh co-location comparison trial results for PM2.5 in Halifax, Canada (V3.0h)
AQMesh co-location comparison trial results for PM2.5 in Minnesota, USA (V3.0)
AQMesh co-location comparison trial results for NO2 in California, USA (V5.0)
A wide range of private, academic and public organisations across the globe are currently using AQMesh
AQMesh has been independently tested and verified in numerous academic studies and publications
Development through extensive global co-location comparison trials in all seasons across each continent means AQMesh air quality monitoring systems can operate in the wides possible range of environments and conditions.
AQMesh air quality monitoring system performance and long-term baseline stability has been proven over many years of independent global co-location trials against certified reference equipment.
The carefully developed data processing algorithms used by AQMesh outdoor air quality monitors are fully traceable and fixed by version number, and, unlike other systems, have been achieved with no use of machine learning or artificial intelligence.
Whilst some manufacturers use a calculation to give an NO2 reading, the AQMesh air quality monitoring system uses a unique O3-filtered NO2 sensor for accurate, direct measurement of NO2.