AQMesh co-location comparison trial results for CO in Minnesota, USA (V4.2.3)
|Correlation co-efficient (R2)||0.87|
|AQMesh processing algorithm||V4.2.3|
|Averaged sample interval||1 hour|
All comparison trials are from regularly maintained reference stations. Not all are specifically identified due to the administrative overhead of getting permission to name data sources. We do not always use ratified reference data to avoid delays in analysis but re-running the comparison analysis after data ratification often improves correlation.
AQMesh co-location comparison trial results for CO in Southern USA (V4.2.3)
AQMesh co-location comparison trial results for NO in Minnesota, USA (V4.2.3)
AQMesh co-location comparison trial results for NO in Slovakia, Europe (V4.2.3)
AQMesh co-location comparison trial results for O3 in Minnesota, USA (V4.2.3)
AQMesh co-location comparison trial results for NO2 in California, USA (V5.0)
AQMesh has been independently tested and verified in numerous academic studies and publications
A wide range of private, academic and public organisations across the globe are currently using AQMesh
Development through extensive global co-location comparison trials in all seasons across each continent means AQMesh air quality monitoring systems can operate in the wides possible range of environments and conditions.
AQMesh prides itself on the level of global customer support it provides to its distributors and end users before, during and after sale. There is no cost for technical support and location is not a barrier.
AQMesh air quality monitoring system performance and long-term baseline stability has been proven over many years of independent global co-location trials against certified reference equipment.
The carefully developed data processing algorithms used by AQMesh outdoor air quality monitors are fully traceable and fixed by version number, and, unlike other systems, have been achieved with no use of machine learning or artificial intelligence.